The Helms-Burton Act, Title III: another example of U.S. hypocrisy
Main Article Content
Abstract
While it has been condemned by most U.N. member states, the U.S. continues to expand its illegal blockade against Cuba. Title III of the Helms-Burton Act of 1996 authorizes U.S. nationals to sue in U.S. courts “any person” who “traffics” in property nationalized by Cuba on or after January 1, 1959. Past U.S. Presidents suspended Title III due to international opposition, but in 2019 President Trump lifted the suspension (continued by President Biden) to allow Title III lawsuits to proceed. Forty-four lawsuits have been filed in U.S. courts. Most suits have targeted U.S. corporations. In 2022, a U.S. court in Florida awarded $439 million to Havana Docks Corporation against four cruise lines for using the Havana port 2016-2019. Expropriation and nationalization are permitted by international law with compensation. Cuba negotiated compensation settlements with all but the U.S., which refused Cuba’s attempts to negotiate. In the U.S., expropriation is a regular occurrence called “eminent domain”. The U.S. Constitution's allows the government to take private property, with just compensation, for “public use,” now expanded by U.S. courts to include taking of private property for private use. U.S. examples abound where persons are forced from homes, land and small business, without just compensation, to allow corporate development. Rather than continue a policy of hypocrisy, the U.S. government should honor the U.N. Charter and cease ignoring the General Assembly’s three-decade demand for an end to the illegal blockade against Cuba.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Doctrinal sources
Adopting Annual Resolution, Delegates in General Assembly Urge Immediate Repeal of Embargo on Cuba, Especially amid Mounting Food, Fuel Crisis, GA/12465, Seventy-seventh Session, 28th Meeting (AM), 3 November 2022.
CUNNINGHAM, Evan, “Great Recession, great recovery? Trends from the Current Population Survey”, Monthly Labor Review, April 2018.
European Commission, Joint Statement by High Representative/Vice President Federica Mogherini and Commissioner for Trade Cecila Malmström on the decision of the United States t further activate Title III of Helms-Burton (Libertad) Act, 17 April 2019, Brussels, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/STATEMENT_19_2171 [accessed 26 November 2023].
General Assembly Resolution 1803 (XVII) of 14 December 1962, “Permanent sovereignty over natural resources”, https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/resources.pdf [accessed 26 November 2023].
HANNAH, Thomas M., “A History of Nationalization in the United States, 1917-2009”, The Next System Project, p. 36, https://thenextsystem.org/sites/default/files/2019-09/A_History_of_Nationalization_in_the_US-Hanna-NSP.pdf
“Necessity of ending the economic, commercial and financial embargo imposed by the United States of America against Cuba”, A/77/358, Seventy-seventh session, Report of the Secretary-General, Agenda item 36, 21 September 2022.
U.S. Department of Justice, Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, Completed Programs -Cuba, updated April 21, 2022, https://www.justice.gov/fcsc/claims-against-cuba [accessed 26 November 2023].
U.S.-Cuba Trade Economic Council, “After 43 Months, Florida District Court Judge Hands First Cuba Libertad Act Verdict-Four Cruise Lines Must Pay US $439,217,424.51 plus US $11,707,484.31 in Legal Fees. Appeals Probable, December 30, 2022”, https://static1.squarespace.com/static/563a4585e4b00d0211e8dd7e/t/63b013f09cd8f9321bb299ea/1672483824437/Libertad+Act+Filing+Statistics.pdf [accessed 26 November 2023].
U.S. Embassy in Cuba, Telephonic Press Briefing with Senior State Department Official on the U.S. Policy toward Cuba, April 17, 2023, https://cu.usembassy.gov/telephonic-press-briefing-with-senior-state-department-official-on-the-u-s-policy-towards-cuba/ [accessed 26 November 2023].
When Taxation Really is Theft, Pacific Legal Foundation, https://homeequitytheft.org/ [accessed 26 November 2023].
Legal sources
Anti-terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, Pub. L 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214 (codified as amended at 8 U.S.C. § 1189 [Supp. II 1996]), 4 April 1996.
Council Regulation (EC) No 2271/96, 22 November 1996, otherwise known as the “Blocking Regulation”.
Cuban Assets Control Regulations 31 C.F.R. Part 515, 8 July 1963.
Cuban Democracy (Torricelli) Act of 1992, Chapter 69, 22 U.S.C. §§6001 et seq., 3 October 1992.
“Cuba, Nationalization Law, 1960”, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 55, No 3, July 1961, https://www.jstor.org/stable/2195928?seq=1 [accessed 26 November 2023].
Export Control Act of 2018, 50 U.S.C. Chapter 58, §§ 4801 et seq., Pub. L 115-132, 17 April 2018.
Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, 22 U.S.C. §§2151 et seq., Pub. L 87-195, Approved 4 September 1961, As Amended Through Pub. L 117-263, Enacted 23 December 2022.
General Assembly Resolution 1803 (XVII) of 14 December 1962, “Permanent sovereignty over natural resources”, https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/resources.pdf [accessed 26 November 2023].
Helms-Burton Act, 22 U.S.C. Chapter 69a, §§6021–6091, Pub. L 104-114, 110 Stat. 785, March 12, 1996.
KENNEDY, John F., Presidential Proclamation 3447, “Embargo on All Trade with Cuba”, 27 FR 1085, 3 CFR 1959-1863, Comp., p. 157, 3 February 1962.
Labor Management Relations Act, also known as Taft-Hartley, 29 U.S.C. §141 et seq., Pub. L 104-320, June 23, 1947.
Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act, Title IX of Pub. L 106-387, 28 October 2000.
Trading with the Enemy Act, 50 U.S.C. Chapter 53, §§95a-95b, 40 Stat. 411, 6 October 1917.
Jurisprudential sources
“Banco Nacional de Cuba vs. Sabbatino”, 376 U.S. 398 (1964).
“Kelo vs. City of New London”, 545 U.S. 469 (2005).
“Tyler vs. Hennipin County, Minnesota”, No. 22-166 (U.S. Supreme Court, May 25, 2023).
“García-Bengochea vs. Carnival Cruise Line”, No. 19-cv-21725-JLK (U.S.D.C., S.D. Fla. August 26, 2019).
“Havana Docks Corp vs. Carnival Cruise Line, et al.”, No. 19-cv-23591 Bloom/McAliley (U.S.D.C., S.D. Fla. Dec. 30, 2022).
“Havana Docks Corp vs. Carnival Cruise Line, et al.”, 19-cv-21724 Bloom/McAliley (U.S.D.C., S.D. Fla. Mar. 13, 2023).