Like scared shrimp. A leap back a hundred years in the affirmation of equality and women's rights
Main Article Content
Abstract
Drawing on the recent judgment in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization of the Supreme Court of the United States, in this contribution we intend to show how the process of control over the female body and human reproduction is a biopolitical technique, a modality that highlights cultural, market and social motives, while attempting to self-justify through the presumed nature of the woman herself.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
BOLOGNA, C., “Aborto e originalismo nei diritti”, Il Mulino, 3 de diciembre de 2022, disponible en https://www.rivistailmulino.it/a/aborto-e-originalismo-nei-diritti
BRIND’AMOUR, C., “Quickening”, en The Embryo Project Encyclopedia, 3 diciembre 2022, disponible en https://embryo.asu.edu/pages/quickening
BOLING, P., Privacy and the Politics of Intimate Life, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 1996.
BRYCE, J., Studies in history and jurisprudence, Vol. II, Oxford University Press.
CARTER, P., “Guiding the Working-Class Girl: Henrietta Rodman's Curriculum for the New Woman, 1913”, Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, No. 38/2017, pp. 124-155.
COREA, G., The Mother Machine: Reproductive Technologies from Artificial Insemination to Artificial Wombs, HarperCollins, New York, 1985.
COVER, R. M., “Foreword: Nomos and Narrative, prefacio a The Supreme Court 1982 Term”, Harvard Law Review, No. 97/1983-1984, pp. 4-68, p. 42.
EINSTEIN, G., “Sex and Gender in Health: The World Writes on the Body”, en M. J. Legato, M. Glezerman (eds.), The International Society for Gender Medicine, Academic Press, Amsterdam, 2017.
ELY, J. H., “The Wages of Crying Wolf: A Comment on Roe v. Wade”, The Yale Law Journal, No. 82/1973, pp. 920-949.
FILIPPINI, N., Generare, partorire, nascere. Una storia dall’antichità alla provetta, Viella, Roma, 2017.
FINLEY, L. M., “Transcending Equality Theory: A Way out of the Maternity and the Workplace Debate”, Columbia Law Review, No. 86/1986, pp. 1118-1182.
FRUG, M. J., “Re-reading contracts: feminist analysis of contracts casebook”, American University Law Review, No. 34/1985, pp. 1065-1140.
GARROW, D. J., Liberty and Sexuality: The Right to Privacy and the Making of Roe v. Wade, Macmillan, New York, 1994.
GUASTINI, R., Distinguendo, Giappichelli, Torino, 1996, trad. Cast, Gedisa, 1999.
GUASTINI, R., L’interpretazione dei documenti normativi, Giuffrè, Milano, 2004.
GUASTINI, R., Interpretar y argumentar, Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales, Madrid, 2004.
INNESS, J. C., Privacy, Intimacy and Isolation, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1992.
JENNINGS, S. K., The Married Lady’s companion: or Poor man’s friend, 1808, disponible en https://wellcomecollection.org/works/d2b5tjkj/items?canvas=5
KAY, H. H., “Equality and Difference: The Case of Pregnancy”, Berkeley Women’s Law Journal, No. 1/1985, pp. 1-38.
KLEIN, V., The Feminine Character, Routledge, London (1946), 1971.
KRIEGER, N., “Genders, sexes, and health: what are the connections - and why does it matter?”, International Journal of Epidemiology, 32, 2003, pp. 652-657.
JOHNS, A., “La piratería farmacéutica y el origen de las patentes médicas”, en JOHNS, A., Piratería. Las luchas por la propiedad intelectual de Gutenberg a Gate, Ediciones Akal, Madrid, 2018.
MCCORVEY, N. y A. MESLER, I Am Roe: My Life, Roe v. Wade, and Freedom of Choice, Harper Collins, New York, 1994.
MACFARLANE, K. A.; M. L. O’NEIL, D. TEKDEMIR, E. ÇETIN, B. BILGEN, A. M. FOSTER, “Politics, policies, pronatalism, and practice: availability and accessibility of abortion and reproductive health services in Turkey”, Reproductive Health Matters, No. 24/2016, pp. 62-70.
MACKINNON, C. A., “The Male Ideology of Privacy: A Feminist Perspective on the Right to Abortion”, Radical America, No. 4 /1983, pp. 23-35, p. 23.
MACKINNON, C. A., “Privacy v. Equality: Beyond Roe v. Wade”, en Feminism Unmodified, Harvard UP, Cambridge, Massachusetts 1987 / traducción al español: “Privacidad versus igualdad: más allá de ‘Roe v. Wade’”, in id., Feminismo Inmodificado, Siglo Veintiuno editores, México DF, 2014.
MARELLA, M. R., “Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, l’Europa e noi”, Giustizia insieme, 3 dicembre 2022, disponible en https://www.giustiziainsieme.it/it/attualita-2/2457-dobbs-v-jackson-women-s-health-organization-l-europa-e-noi
MOHR, J. C., Abortion in America: The Origins and Evolution of National Policy, 1800-1900, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1979.
NORTH, A., “What Amy Coney Barrett on the Supreme Court means for abortion rights”, Vox, 26 de octubre de 2020, disponible en https://www.vox.com/21456044/amy-coney-barrett-supreme-court-roe-abortion
O’NEIL, M. L., “The availability of abortion at state hospitals in Turkey: A national study”, Contraception, No. 95/2017, pp. 148-153.
PALLEN, M. A., “Foeticide or Criminal Abortion”, The Medical Archives, No. 3/1869, pp. 205-206.
POST, R. y R. SIEGEL, “Originalism as a Political Practice: The Right’s Living Constitution”, Fordham Law Review, No. 75/2006, pp. 545-574, p. 549.
POZZOLO, S., “La libertà dalla povertà come diritto fondamentale”, en Materiali per una storia della cultura giuridica, 2, 2004.
SHAI, A., et al., “Feminism, gender medicine and beyond: a feminist analysis of ‘gender medicine’”, International Journal for Equity in Health, 20:177, 2021, pp. 1-11.
SCHAMBELAN, B., Roe v. Wade, Running Press, Philadelphia, 1992.
SHARMA, M., “Applying feminist theory to medical education”, Lancet, 393, 2019, pp. 570-578.
SIEGEL, R., “Reasoning from the Body: A Historical Perspective on Abortion Regulation and Questions of Equal Protection”, Stanford Law Review, No. 44/1992, pp. 261-381.
SIEGEL, R. B., “Memory Games: Dobbs’s Originalism as Anti-Democratic Living Constitutionalism - and Some Pathways for Resistance”, Texas Law Review, No. 101/2023 (forthcoming).
SIEGEL, R. B., “Why Restrict Abortion? Expanding the Frame on June Medical”, The Supreme Court Review, 2021, pp. 277-365, p. 286 y notas 33-35.
SIEGEL, R. B., “The Politics of Constitutional Memory”, Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy, No. 1, 2022, pp. 19-58.
SPERTI, A., “Il diritto all’aborto ed il ruolo della tradizione nel controverso overruling di Roe v. Wade”, La Rivista “Gruppo di Pisa”, No. 3/2022.
STORER, H. R., “On the Decrease of the Rate of Increase of Population, Now Obtaining in Europe and America”, American Journal of Science and Arts, Vol. XLIII, March, 1867, disponible en https://collections.nlm.nih.gov/ext/dw/101505674/PDF/101505674.pdf
STORER, H. R., Why not? A book for every woman, Lee and Shepard, Boston, 1867.
TRIPODINA, C., “L'argomento originalista nella giurisprudenza costituzionale in materia di diritti fondamentali”, en F. Giuffre, I. Nicotra (eds.), Lavori preparatori ed original intent nella giurisprudenza della Corte costituzionale, Giappichelli, Torino, 2008, disponible en http://www.dircost.unito.it/SentNet1.01/studi/Tripodina_Argomento_originalista.pdf
TREICHLER, P. A., “Feminism, Medicine, and the Meaning of Childbirth”, in M. Jacobs, E. Fox Keller, S. Shuttleworth (eds.), Body/Politics. Women and the Discourse of Science, Routledge, N.Y-London, 1990.
WEISSMANN, A., “Sexual Equality under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act”, Columbia Law Review, No. 83/1983, pp. 690-726.
WESTIN, A., Privacy and Freedom, Atheneum, New York, 1968.