Competing interpretations of the constitution
Main Article Content
Abstract
Assuming that there would be competing interpreters of the constitution requires a clarification of what it means to “interpret the constitution”. Then, the identification of a possible diversity of interpreters as actors has to be examined in the light of what is meant by a competition of interpretation: the possibility of producing different constitutional norms, equally (more or less) effective.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
CHAMPEIL-DESPLATS, Véronique, Les Principes fondamentaux reconnus par les lois de la République; principes constitutionnels et justifications dans les discours juridiques, Economica, 2001.
CHAMPEIL-DESPLATS, Véronique, Christophe GRZEGORCZYK y Michel TROPER (Eds.), Théorie des contraintes juridiques, Bruylant/LGDJ, Brussels/Paris, 2005.
CHIASSONI, Pierluigi, “Codici interpretativi. Progetto di voce per un Vademecum giuridico”, en Paolo Comanducci y Riccardo Guastini (Eds.), Analisi e diritto 2002-2003. Ricerche di giurisprudenza analitica, Giappichelli, Turin, 2004.
DWORKIN, Ronald, Taking Rights Seriously, Duckworth, Londres, 1978.
GRAY, John Chipman, The Nature and Sources of the Law, Columbia University Press, New York, 1909.
GUASTINI, Riccardo, “Le réalisme juridique redéfini”, Revue de la Recherche Juridique – Droit prospectif, 2013, No. 3, pp. 1123-1135.
HART, H.L.A., Le concept de droit, 2a ed., Facultés universitaires de Saint Louis, Brussels, 2005.
KELSEN, Hans, Teoría Pura del Derecho, trad. de la 2a ed. en alemán por Charles Eisenmann), Dalloz, París, 1962.
TROPER, Michel, “Replique à Otto Pfersmann”, RFDC 2002/2, No. 50, pp. 335-353.
WRÓBLEWSKI, Jerzy, “Legal Decision and Its Justification”, Logique et Analyse, vol. 14, No. 53/54, marzo-junio de 1971.