Five different issues and the same institution: Thinking of the future of international commercial arbitration
Main Article Content
Abstract
International commercial arbitration has achieved a level of popularity and use never before known. Its current success, however, does not hide the tensions and changes of importance that accompany it nowadays. Many of them have a direct and, not always positive, effect on the institution, affecting some of the virtues on which its vigorous present time has been built and its future. This article deals with five different sectors of international commercial arbitration, providing some keys, necessarily provisional, about its immediate future.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
BARONA VILAR, S., Algoritmización del Derecho y de la Justicia. De la Inteligencia Artificial a la Smart Justice, tirant lo blanch, Valencia, 2021.
BARONA VILAR, S., “Algoritmización de la justicia y robotización judicial”, en M. Azuaje y P. Contreras (eds.), Inteligencia artificial y derecho: desafíos y perspectivas, tirant lo blanch, Valencia, 2021.
BARONA VILAR, S., “Artículo 40. Acción de anulación del laudo”, en S. Barona Vilar, Comentarios a la Ley de Arbitraje. Ley 60/2003 de 23 de diciembre, tras la reforma de la Ley 11/2011, de 20 de mayo, 2ª ed., Thomson Reuters Civitas, Cizur Menor, 2011.
BARONA VILAR, S., “La mediación y su espacio en el hábitat de la justicia integral, global, algorítmica: ¿Más o menos protagonismo?”, en S. Barona Vilar (eda.), Meditaciones sobre mediación (MED+), tirant lo blanch, Valencia, 2021.
BARONA VILAR, S., “Mutación de la justicia en el siglo XXI. Elementos para una mirada poliédrica de la tutela de la ciudadanía”, en S. Barona Vilar (eda.), Justicia poliédrica en período de mudanza (Nuevos conceptos, nuevos sujetos, nuevos instrumentos y nueva intensidad), tirant lo blanch, Valencia, 2021.
BARONA VILAR, S., Nociones y principios de las ADR (Solución extrajurisdiccional de conflictos), tirant lo blanch, Valencia, 2018.
BARONA VILAR, S., “Psicoanálisis de las ADR retos en la sociedad global del siglo XXI”, La Ley Mediación y Arbitraje, No. 1, 2020.
BARONA VILAR, S., “Una justicia ‘digital’ y ‘algorítmica’ para una sociedad en estado de mudanza”, en S. Barona Vilar (eda.), Justicia Algorítmica y neuroderecho. Una mirada multidisciplinar, Tirant lo Blanch, Valencia, 2021.
BLACKABY, N.; C. PARTASIDES, A. REDFERN, et al., Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration, 6ª ed., OUP, Oxford, 2015.
BORN, G. y K. BEALE, “Party Autonomy and Default Rules: Reframing the Debate Over Summary Disposition in International Arbitration”, ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin, Vol. 21, No. 2, 2010.
DUONG, T. B. (D), “The Evolution of Summary Procedure in Investment Arbitration: Past, Present and Future”, Arbitration International, Vol. 37, 2021.
ESIS VILLAROEL, I. S., “La inteligencia artificial y el arbitraje comercial internacional: ¿complemento o sustitución?”, en M. Azuaje y P. Contreras (eds.), Inteligencia artificial y derecho: desafíos y perspectivas, tirant lo blanch, Valencia, 2021.
ESPLUGUES MOTA, C., “Cruzando el espejo arbitral: las propuestas de la CNUDMI en materia de arbitraje acelerado y la búsqueda del ‘Triángulo Mágico’”, en S. Barona Vilar (eda.), Psicoanálisis del arbitraje: solución o problema en el actual paradigma de Justicia, tirant lo blanch, Valencia, 2020.
ESPLUGUES MOTA, C., “¿Eficiencia v. Justicia en el plano arbitral: dilema ficticio o selección unidireccional? En torno a la figura de la desestimación temprana de la demanda”, en S. Barona Vilar (eda.), Justicia poliédrica en período de mudanza (Nuevos conceptos, nuevos sujetos, nuevos instrumentos y nueva intensidad), tirant lo blanch, Valencia, 2021.
ESPLUGUES MOTA, C., “El arbitraje comercial en Iberoamérica: una realidad consolidada no exenta de tensiones”, en C. Esplugues Mota (ed.), Tratado de arbitraje comercial interno e internacional en Iberoamérica, tirant lo blanch, Valencia, 2019.
ESPLUGUES MOTA, C., “La Convención de Singapur de 2018 sobre mediación y la creación de un título deslocalizado dotado de fuerza ejecutiva: una apuesta novedosa, y un mal relato”, REDI, Vol. 72, No. 1, 2020.
ESPLUGUES MOTA, C., “Los trabajos de la CNUDMI en materia de arbitraje y el mantra de la celeridad”, Revista Argentina de Arbitraje, No. 5, 2020.
ESPLUGUES MOTA, C., “Quo Vadis Arbitratio?”, en S. Barona Vilar (eda.), Mediación, Arbitraje y Jurisdicción en el actual paradigma de justicia, tirant lo blanch, Valencia, 2016.
FERNÁNDEZ MASIÁ, E., “La financiación por terceros en el arbitraje internacional”, CdT, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2016.
GERBAY, R., “Due Process Paranoia”, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 6.6.2016, disponible en http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/author/remy-gerbay/ [último acceso 10.12.2021].
HAERI, H.; C. BARÓ HUELMO y G. GASPAROTTI, “Third-Party Funding in International Arbitration”, Global Arbitration Review, 20.1.2021, disponible en https://globalarbitrationreview.com/guide/the-guide-ma-arbitration/3rd-edition/article/third-party-funding-in-international-arbitration#footnote-138-backlink [último acceso 10.12.2021].
HOFFMANN-NOWOTNY, U. y L. BURRUS, “Switzerland”, The Third Party Litigation Funding Law Review, 22.11.2021, disponible en https://thelawreviews.co.uk/title/the-third-party-litigation-funding-law-review/switzerland [último acceso 10.12.2021].
INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION, Report of the ICCA-Queen Mary Task Force on Third-Party Funding in International Arbitration, April 2018, The ICCA Reports No. 4, disponible en https://www.arbitration-icca.org/icca-reports-no-4-icca-queen-mary-task-force-report-third-party-funding [último acceso 14.12.2021].
KIRBY, J., “Efficiency in International Arbitration: Whose Duty Is It?”, Journal of International Arbitration, Vol. 32, No. 6, 2015.
KOPECKÝ, L. y V. PERNT, “A Bid for Strong Arbitrators”, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 15.4.2016, disponible en http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2016/04/15/a-bid-for-strong-arbitrators/ [último acceso 10.12.2021].
KOVACS, B., “Efficiency in International Arbitration: An Economic Approach”, Am. Rev. Int’l. Arb., Vol. 23, No. 1, 2012.
KÜHNER, D., “Annulment and enforcement of arbitral awards in France”, en Annulment and enforcement of arbitral awards from a comparative law perspective: contributions from CEPANI40 colloquium held on October 18, 2018, Kluwer, Mechelen, 2018.
KUNZ, C.A., “Waiver of Right to Challenge and International Arbitral Award is not incompatible with ECHR: Tabbane v Switzerland, European International Arbitration Review, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2016.
LARREA, A., “To Annul or not to Annul: The Constitutional Court of Ecuador Finally Set Clear Rules for the Annulment of an Arbitral Award”, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 15.2.2021, disponible en http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2021/02/15/to-annul-or-not-to-annul-the-constitutional-court-of-ecuador-finally-set-clear-rules-for-the-annulment-of-an-arbitral-award/ [último acceso 1.12.2021].
Lord Justice Jackson Third Party Funding or Litigation Funding Sixth Lecture in the Civil Litigation Costs Review Implementation Programme. The Royal Courts of Justice, 23.11.2011, disponible en https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/JCO/Documents/Reports/jackson-final-report-140110.pdf [último acceso 6.12.2021].
NOLAN-HALEY, J., “Mediation: The “New Arbitration”, Harv. Negot. L.Rev., Vol. 17, 2012.
PRIBETIC, A.I., “The “Third Option”: International Commercial Mediation”, World Arbitration & Mediation Review, Vol. 1, No. 4, 2007.
QUEEN MARY / WHITE & CASE, 2021 International Arbitration Survey: Adapting Arbitration to a Changing World, 2021, disponible en http://www.arbitration.qmul.ac.uk/research/2021-international-arbitration-survey/ [último acceso 7.12.2021].
QUEEN MARY / WHITE & CASE, 2015 International Arbitration Survey: Improvements and Innovations in International Arbitration, Londres, 2015, p. 37, disponible en http://www.arbitration.qmul.ac.uk/research/2015/ [último acceso 8.12.2021].
RAMESH, S., “Third-Party Funding in International Arbitration: Ownership of the Claim, Consequences for Costs Orders, and Regulation”, Arbitration International, Vol. 36, 2020.
RAVIV, A., “No More Excuses: Toward a Workable System of Dispositive Motions in International Arbitration”, Arb. Intl., Vol. 28, No. 3, 2012.
SAN ROMAN GUIJARRO, L., “Summary Disposition: The Only Way Out is through”, University of Miami Law Review, Vol. 66, No. 3, 2012.
SEIDENBERG, S., “International Arbitration Loses Its Grip”, ABAJournal, 1.4.2010, disponible en https://www.abajournal.com/magazine/article/international_arbitration_loses_its_grip/ [último acceso 11.12.2021].
SIM, Ch., “Third Party Funding in Asia: whose duty to disclose?”, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 22.5.2018, disponible en http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2018/05/22/third-party-funding-asia-whose-duty-disclose/ [último acceso 4.12.2021].
SMYTH, R., “Do Judges Behave as Homo Economicus, and If So, Can We Measure Their Performance? An Antipodean Perspective on Tournament of Judges”, Florida State UL Rev., Vol. 32, 2004-2005.
STIPANOWICH, Th. J., “Arbitration: The ‘New Litigation’”, University of Illinois Law Review, No. 1, 2010.
SUSSMAN, E., “The New York Convention through a Mediation Prism”, Dispute Resolution Magazine, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2009.
TEO, B. y E. LIM, “Summary Dismissal in Arbitration: Different Standards in Different Rules?”, Drew & Napier Arbitration Update, 15.7.2019, disponible en https://www.drewnapier.com/publications/Summary-dismissal-in-arbitration-Different-standar
TETLEY, A., “Judicial Control of Arbitral Awards in the United Kingdom”, en L. A. Di Matteo; M. Infantino y N.M-P. Potin (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Judicial Control of Arbitral Awards, CUP, Cambridge, 2020.
WERNER, J., “The Arbitrator as Master of Time”, J. World Inv. & Trade, vol. 12, No. 2, 2011.
WONG, T. y Y. ZHAO, “Virtual Hearings: HKIAC Releases Guidelines to Encourage Embracing the New Normal”, disponible en https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=af6f7d6a-bbf2-4d78-bf16-a6a33c2f6934 [último acceso 11.12.2021].
YUN, I. L.W., “Hong Kong”, The Third Party Litigation Funding Law Review, 22.11.2021, disponible en https://thelawreviews.co.uk/title/the-third-party-litigation-funding-law-review/hong-kong [último acceso 10.12.2021].